OK, this isn’t really totally in line with the life science
theme of this blog, but I personally found it really cool! And this is because
on one hand I am interested in biology and its concepts in general, and that
includes evolution, and on the other hand – I love music. Additionally, I have
always wondered, what makes popular music… popular? How come “Poker face” by
Lady Gaga was such a hit while “Dance in the dark” not so much? And this study
that I stumbled upon combines these two phenomena – evolution under selective pressure
and music.
So, evolution under pressure. Without going into too much
detail, when some organisms, which can be as simple as bacteria or as complex
as humans, start living in a new environment that is in some way different than
the previous one, they evolve. For instance, a long time ago people from Africa
– where it’s hot – migrated north, where it’s colder. Breathing in cold air
through black people’s wide nostrils was probably not very healthy as it cooled
downs their respiratory tracts easily and facilitated viral infections. But
some people randomly developed more narrow noses. The air takes slightly longer
to go through such a narrow passage and so gets warmed up before it reaches
deeper parts of our air pipes. Warm air is something viruses don’t like, so
they were less likely to cause respiratory infections in narrow-nosed people.
Less infections equals less death equals longer life equals more time and
opportunity to produce offspring who would also have the narrow nostrils. And
so, in the European climate the narrow-nose trait took over the wide-nose one.
The study I’m going to talk about next (1), conducted at Imperial
College London, subjected music to a similar process of evolution under pressure.
It infused short pieces of music with genetic features and as the selective pressure
– it used human taste. How did they make the evolution of music happen? Well,
first they designed some programs that created pieces of music made of notes occurring
at pretty much random pitches and timings, or in other words, made of random
melody and rhythm. Then they had several thousands of people listen to those
musical samples and rate them based on how pleasant they were to listen to. The
half of the samples that was least pleasant was eliminated (died), while the
other half was allowed to randomly pair. Within pairs, bits of musical samples
were exchanged between one another to create a new “daughter” piece of music,
the same way that we get the genes from each of our two parents randomly. At
this stage, the authors allowed for rare random changes in the “daughter” music
samples, i.e. bits of music or rhythm not present in either of the “parent”
tunes. This was mirroring mutations, like the occurrence of the narrow nostrils
in white people. Obviously these random changes in the daughter pieces could be
either pleasant for the listener or unpleasant and contributed to either higher
or lower score they received. And then, again, the highest-scoring 50% of
samples was allowed to “survive” and “have sex” and produce the next generation
of musical offspring. If you go to http://soundcloud.com/uncoolbob/sets/darwintunes/,
you will be able to listen to the whole concept presented by Dr. MacCallum, the
lead author of the whole project (the first track on the list), as well as
music samples selected at certain “generations”. It is fascinating to hear how
music in these samples gradually changes from random noise-like sequences of
sounds to quite organised, structured and pleasant pieces of music.
Obviously, the study doesn’t exactly mirror how pop music is
created. Firstly, music as we know it did not start as a random collection of
sounds that sounded plain annoying. Secondly, new pieces of music do not arise
as hybrids of existing songs (well, for the most). I mean, even if someone did
put together “Bad romance” with “Like a prayer”, I can imagine this mix gaining
some popularity but I struggle to see it staying at the top of pop lists as
long as either of these two songs did.
Nonetheless, the whole concept is very interesting and the
samples are just fun to listen to!
1. Evolution of music by public choice.
No comments:
Post a Comment